<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1179 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170964</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s civil appeals was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the appeals and dismissed them. The order records only that the Court heard the Additional Solicitor General for the Revenue and then rejected the civil appeals without setting out any further substantive reasoning. The operative effect is that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the dismissal stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1179 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170964</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s civil appeals was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the appeals and dismissed them. The order records only that the Court heard the Additional Solicitor General for the Revenue and then rejected the civil appeals without setting out any further substantive reasoning. The operative effect is that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the dismissal stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>