https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170954 A petition for rectification of the register of members under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be decided in summary jurisdiction where the dispute involved allegations of fraud, forgery, fabrication of documents, disputed title to shares, and contested transfer transactions. The Board noted that questions about the genuineness of transfer forms, minutes, shareholder consent, and the existence of fraud required oral and documentary evidence, which could not be conclusively determined on affidavits. Such controversies were held to be unsuitable for summary adjudication under Section 111 and were more appropriately tried in a civil court. The petitions were therefore held not maintainable for that purpose. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170954 A petition for rectification of the register of members under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be decided in summary jurisdiction where the dispute involved allegations of fraud, forgery, fabrication of documents, disputed title to shares, and contested transfer transactions. The Board noted that questions about the genuineness of transfer forms, minutes, shareholder consent, and the existence of fraud required oral and documentary evidence, which could not be conclusively determined on affidavits. Such controversies were held to be unsuitable for summary adjudication under Section 111 and were more appropriately tried in a civil court. The petitions were therefore held not maintainable for that purpose. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170954