<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 405 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, setting aside the order of the Collector (Appeals) and restoring the order of the Assistant Collector. The rebate of cess on exported motor vehicles was denied, as no specific notification under Rule 12 read with Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules was issued. The stay application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 10:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 405 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, setting aside the order of the Collector (Appeals) and restoring the order of the Assistant Collector. The rebate of cess on exported motor vehicles was denied, as no specific notification under Rule 12 read with Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules was issued. The stay application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>