<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT - AHM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a small contractor, in a tax dispute case. Despite not contesting the duty and interest payment, the appellant argued against penalties, emphasizing prompt full payment and reasonable belief in tax applicability under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal agreed that penalties were unwarranted as there was no intent to evade payment, citing lack of separate tax collection evidence and referencing case laws and CBEC Circulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT - AHM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a small contractor, in a tax dispute case. Despite not contesting the duty and interest payment, the appellant argued against penalties, emphasizing prompt full payment and reasonable belief in tax applicability under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal agreed that penalties were unwarranted as there was no intent to evade payment, citing lack of separate tax collection evidence and referencing case laws and CBEC Circulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>