<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 134 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261173</link>
    <description>Review petitions in central excise matters were dismissed after the Court found no error apparent in the earlier order warranting reconsideration. Applications seeking open hearing were also rejected, as the record of the civil appeals did not disclose any ground for review. The operative effect was that the challenged order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 134 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261173</link>
      <description>Review petitions in central excise matters were dismissed after the Court found no error apparent in the earlier order warranting reconsideration. Applications seeking open hearing were also rejected, as the record of the civil appeals did not disclose any ground for review. The operative effect was that the challenged order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>