<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 127 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261166</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is attracted where an assessee files a revised return only after being confronted with material indicating undisclosed expenditure or inaccurate particulars. The note states that a claim of voluntary surrender to buy peace does not, by itself, negate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. It also records that the assessee&#039;s explanation was not acceptable, and that the absence of independent support from seized papers did not prevent reliance on the assessee&#039;s own conduct and revised disclosure. A consistency argument based on another assessment year was rejected, and the penalty deletion by the Tribunal was described as incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 127 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261166</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is attracted where an assessee files a revised return only after being confronted with material indicating undisclosed expenditure or inaccurate particulars. The note states that a claim of voluntary surrender to buy peace does not, by itself, negate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. It also records that the assessee&#039;s explanation was not acceptable, and that the absence of independent support from seized papers did not prevent reliance on the assessee&#039;s own conduct and revised disclosure. A consistency argument based on another assessment year was rejected, and the penalty deletion by the Tribunal was described as incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>