<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the nature of job work contracts and TDS applicability under Section 194C(2) based on a relevant precedent. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-payable amounts and for account writing charges and audit fees were upheld. The Tribunal stressed the significance of following established legal precedents for fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the nature of job work contracts and TDS applicability under Section 194C(2) based on a relevant precedent. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-payable amounts and for account writing charges and audit fees were upheld. The Tribunal stressed the significance of following established legal precedents for fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>