<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 119 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261158</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to make additions based only on incriminating material found during the search. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the assessment was made without any incriminating material. The order was pronounced on June 25, 2015, at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 119 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261158</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to make additions based only on incriminating material found during the search. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the assessment was made without any incriminating material. The order was pronounced on June 25, 2015, at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>