<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 110 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It emphasized the legislative intent behind sections 10B and 92-C, preventing misuse for undue benefits. The Tribunal ruled against the assessee on issues related to deduction under section 10B for self-added amounts under section 92-C and interest under sections 234B and 234C. However, it favored the assessee on the enlargement of the CIT&#039;s order scope and computation of deduction under section 10B without setting off losses. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding R&amp;amp;D expenses set off against export income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 110 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It emphasized the legislative intent behind sections 10B and 92-C, preventing misuse for undue benefits. The Tribunal ruled against the assessee on issues related to deduction under section 10B for self-added amounts under section 92-C and interest under sections 234B and 234C. However, it favored the assessee on the enlargement of the CIT&#039;s order scope and computation of deduction under section 10B without setting off losses. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding R&amp;amp;D expenses set off against export income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>