<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1218 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170945</link>
    <description>In the central excise appeal, the Supreme Court dismissed the delay in filing, bringing the proceedings to an end at the threshold. The order records no substantive determination on the underlying excise dispute and reflects only the adverse outcome on limitation for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1218 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170945</link>
      <description>In the central excise appeal, the Supreme Court dismissed the delay in filing, bringing the proceedings to an end at the threshold. The order records no substantive determination on the underlying excise dispute and reflects only the adverse outcome on limitation for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>