<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 103 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed indexation for cost calculation to commence from the payment dates rather than the possession date of the flat. Additionally, the Tribunal held that expenses such as Stamp Duty, registration charges, brokerage paid, and interest on delayed payments should be included in the flat&#039;s acquisition cost for calculating gains or losses on its sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 103 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed indexation for cost calculation to commence from the payment dates rather than the possession date of the flat. Additionally, the Tribunal held that expenses such as Stamp Duty, registration charges, brokerage paid, and interest on delayed payments should be included in the flat&#039;s acquisition cost for calculating gains or losses on its sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>