<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 101 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Review Applications seeking a review of its Order dated 19/12/2014. The Tribunal found that the grounds for review were not met as there were no errors apparent on the face of the record or new facts emerging. The decision was based on the limited scope of the power of review as per legal precedents, ultimately upholding the original decision and rejecting the request for remand for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 101 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Review Applications seeking a review of its Order dated 19/12/2014. The Tribunal found that the grounds for review were not met as there were no errors apparent on the face of the record or new facts emerging. The decision was based on the limited scope of the power of review as per legal precedents, ultimately upholding the original decision and rejecting the request for remand for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>