<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 100 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund for port services, courier services, and Customs House Agent services for both appellants, subject to specific conditions. However, the refund for technical testing and inspection services was denied due to the lack of necessary documentation. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of each issue raised and clarifies the eligibility criteria for refund of service tax paid on different input services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 100 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund for port services, courier services, and Customs House Agent services for both appellants, subject to specific conditions. However, the refund for technical testing and inspection services was denied due to the lack of necessary documentation. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of each issue raised and clarifies the eligibility criteria for refund of service tax paid on different input services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>