<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 99 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261138</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order rejecting the refund claim for input service on terminal handling charges was set aside. The appellant, who used the services in the course of export business and paid the service tax, was entitled to the refund claim despite the services not being defined as Port Service. The Circular clarified that the specific category of service tax payment is not relevant if services are availed in the course of export business and service tax is paid, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 99 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261138</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order rejecting the refund claim for input service on terminal handling charges was set aside. The appellant, who used the services in the course of export business and paid the service tax, was entitled to the refund claim despite the services not being defined as Port Service. The Circular clarified that the specific category of service tax payment is not relevant if services are availed in the course of export business and service tax is paid, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>