<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 98 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application as the final order had been passed, deeming the appeal against the stay order not maintainable. The Tribunal considered the liability to pay service tax on reimbursed expenses, finding in favor of the appellant based on decisions from the High Courts of Delhi and Madras. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (A) to decide the appeal on merits without any pre-deposit, following principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 98 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application as the final order had been passed, deeming the appeal against the stay order not maintainable. The Tribunal considered the liability to pay service tax on reimbursed expenses, finding in favor of the appellant based on decisions from the High Courts of Delhi and Madras. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (A) to decide the appeal on merits without any pre-deposit, following principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>