<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 95 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261134</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal, which waived the pre-deposit requirement to address the appeal directly. The appellant&#039;s claim of non-receipt of the order-in-original was refuted based on verification with jurisdictional officers and submission of an acknowledgment with the company&#039;s stamp. Despite challenges to the acknowledgment copy&#039;s validity, the Tribunal found it sufficient for establishing delivery. The Tribunal upheld the time bar decision, citing a Supreme Court precedent, and dismissed the appeal, COD application, and stay petition, emphasizing adherence to the ruling in Singh Enterprises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 95 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261134</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal, which waived the pre-deposit requirement to address the appeal directly. The appellant&#039;s claim of non-receipt of the order-in-original was refuted based on verification with jurisdictional officers and submission of an acknowledgment with the company&#039;s stamp. Despite challenges to the acknowledgment copy&#039;s validity, the Tribunal found it sufficient for establishing delivery. The Tribunal upheld the time bar decision, citing a Supreme Court precedent, and dismissed the appeal, COD application, and stay petition, emphasizing adherence to the ruling in Singh Enterprises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>