<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of Rs. 9,56,36,478 under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by invoking certain sections without proving any arrangement resulting in more than ordinary profits. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the AO to provide substantial reasons and evidence for any disallowance under Section 10B, which was lacking in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of Rs. 9,56,36,478 under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by invoking certain sections without proving any arrangement resulting in more than ordinary profits. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the AO to provide substantial reasons and evidence for any disallowance under Section 10B, which was lacking in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>