<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 966 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170932</link>
    <description>The Company Petition was made absolute, ordering the winding up of the respondent company under the Companies Act, 1956, due to the respondent&#039;s failure to repay the confirmed balance owed for goods sold and delivered. The absence of an affidavit in reply and the respondent&#039;s non-appearance further supported this decision. The petitioner was granted costs of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000/- to be recovered in the winding up proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 966 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170932</link>
      <description>The Company Petition was made absolute, ordering the winding up of the respondent company under the Companies Act, 1956, due to the respondent&#039;s failure to repay the confirmed balance owed for goods sold and delivered. The absence of an affidavit in reply and the respondent&#039;s non-appearance further supported this decision. The petitioner was granted costs of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000/- to be recovered in the winding up proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>