https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170930 The High Court upheld the decision of the Writ Court, ruling that the appellant's writ petition and subsequent appeal lacked merit. The assessing authority's discretionary power under section 220(6) of the IT Act to require partial payment pending appeal was deemed lawful and not arbitrary. The Court emphasized that interference with such discretion is only warranted if it violates fundamental principles of justice, which was not the case here. The appellant's appeal was dismissed, with no costs imposed. en-us Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170930 The High Court upheld the decision of the Writ Court, ruling that the appellant's writ petition and subsequent appeal lacked merit. The assessing authority's discretionary power under section 220(6) of the IT Act to require partial payment pending appeal was deemed lawful and not arbitrary. The Court emphasized that interference with such discretion is only warranted if it violates fundamental principles of justice, which was not the case here. The appellant's appeal was dismissed, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170930