<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261094</link>
    <description>The court quashed the intimation notices issued under Section 245 for the adjustment of refunds, citing non-compliance with procedural requirements. It directed reconsideration of the matter and fresh speaking orders. The court did not address the merits of the Stay Application against tax recovery, leaving it for subsequent proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261094</link>
      <description>The court quashed the intimation notices issued under Section 245 for the adjustment of refunds, citing non-compliance with procedural requirements. It directed reconsideration of the matter and fresh speaking orders. The court did not address the merits of the Stay Application against tax recovery, leaving it for subsequent proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>