<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 47 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleted additions made based on impounded documents, and dismissed the departmental appeal. The Tribunal found the assessee successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 292C by providing evidence and criticized the AO for inadequate investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue should act on information provided and take action against the actual parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 47 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleted additions made based on impounded documents, and dismissed the departmental appeal. The Tribunal found the assessee successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 292C by providing evidence and criticized the AO for inadequate investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue should act on information provided and take action against the actual parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>