<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 623 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the increase in the promoters&#039; voting rights due to a buyback did not constitute an acquisition under Regulation 11(1) of the SEBI Regulations. As a result, the appellants were not obligated to make a public announcement. The Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, making subsequent orders irrelevant. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 623 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the increase in the promoters&#039; voting rights due to a buyback did not constitute an acquisition under Regulation 11(1) of the SEBI Regulations. As a result, the appellants were not obligated to make a public announcement. The Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, making subsequent orders irrelevant. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>