<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise duty confirmation using extended limitation period is improper without addressing if activity qualifies as manufacturing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23599</link>
    <description>Confirmation of excise duty by invoking longer period of limitation, without going into the legal issue as to whether the activity amount to manufacture or not, would not be appropriate inasmuch as the appellant was admittedly discharging the service tax liability - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:24:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise duty confirmation using extended limitation period is improper without addressing if activity qualifies as manufacturing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23599</link>
      <description>Confirmation of excise duty by invoking longer period of limitation, without going into the legal issue as to whether the activity amount to manufacture or not, would not be appropriate inasmuch as the appellant was admittedly discharging the service tax liability - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:24:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>