https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261070 The Court found the demand notice and rejection of representation based on a Circular previously declared non est to be disrespectful and defiant of its order. Contemplating contempt proceedings, the Court admitted the writ petition, stayed the demand notice, and directed the petitioner to provide officeholders' names. Emphasizing that the writ petition would not affect the appeal/stay application's merit consideration, the Court safeguarded the petitioner's rights against the authorities' actions, vacating the bank account attachment and addressing the recovered amount's handling. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:48:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261070 The Court found the demand notice and rejection of representation based on a Circular previously declared non est to be disrespectful and defiant of its order. Contemplating contempt proceedings, the Court admitted the writ petition, stayed the demand notice, and directed the petitioner to provide officeholders' names. Emphasizing that the writ petition would not affect the appeal/stay application's merit consideration, the Court safeguarded the petitioner's rights against the authorities' actions, vacating the bank account attachment and addressing the recovered amount's handling. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261070