<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261055</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for outstanding creditors in the respondent&#039;s books. The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling that as the liability was acknowledged in the balance-sheet, there was no cessation of liability triggering Section 41(1). The court emphasized that acknowledging the amount due to creditors in the balance-sheet constitutes acknowledgment of liability, and the introduction of Explanation1 to Section 41 in 1997 did not apply in this case. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261055</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for outstanding creditors in the respondent&#039;s books. The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling that as the liability was acknowledged in the balance-sheet, there was no cessation of liability triggering Section 41(1). The court emphasized that acknowledging the amount due to creditors in the balance-sheet constitutes acknowledgment of liability, and the introduction of Explanation1 to Section 41 in 1997 did not apply in this case. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>