<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 5 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments framed under Section 153A for the relevant assessment years due to the absence of incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the additions made under Section 68 and the disallowances under Section 14A were also invalidated. The Tribunal emphasized that assessments under Section 153A should be based on incriminating material and that mere statements without corroborative evidence are insufficient to justify additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 5 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments framed under Section 153A for the relevant assessment years due to the absence of incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the additions made under Section 68 and the disallowances under Section 14A were also invalidated. The Tribunal emphasized that assessments under Section 153A should be based on incriminating material and that mere statements without corroborative evidence are insufficient to justify additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>