<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Transfer Pricing Officer wrongly applied the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in certain transactions. The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was deemed more appropriate, leading to the deletion of the additions. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific grounds dismissed. The decision was pronounced on April 27, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Transfer Pricing Officer wrongly applied the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in certain transactions. The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was deemed more appropriate, leading to the deletion of the additions. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific grounds dismissed. The decision was pronounced on April 27, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>