<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 603 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170918</link>
    <description>Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 permits admission of a delayed application only when the applicant shows sufficient cause for the delay beyond the prescribed limitation period; the explanation need not cover time still within limitation, but must account for the entire period after expiry. The Tribunal&#039;s condonation power under sub-section (3) operates only after the statutory period has run and on a proper showing of sufficient cause. Here, the explanation that the applicants acted after learning of relief in another matter did not justify their earlier inaction within time, so the condonation order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 603 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170918</link>
      <description>Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 permits admission of a delayed application only when the applicant shows sufficient cause for the delay beyond the prescribed limitation period; the explanation need not cover time still within limitation, but must account for the entire period after expiry. The Tribunal&#039;s condonation power under sub-section (3) operates only after the statutory period has run and on a proper showing of sufficient cause. Here, the explanation that the applicants acted after learning of relief in another matter did not justify their earlier inaction within time, so the condonation order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>