<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1072 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170915</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that the view taken by CESTAT under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not proper. The judgment reiterated the decision of a Division Bench in other connected appeals, where the questions of law were answered against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1072 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170915</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that the view taken by CESTAT under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not proper. The judgment reiterated the decision of a Division Bench in other connected appeals, where the questions of law were answered against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>