<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Duty-Free Import for EOU Leads to Revenue Loss; Demand for Duty Difference Justified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23583</link>
    <description>Import of the goods duty-free for use thereof in EOU - The duty forgone at the time of import became loss to Revenue. - appellant has discharged duty liability at normal rate of excise duty which is not equal to customs duty forgone. - prima facie the demand raised appears to be correct - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:15:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Duty-Free Import for EOU Leads to Revenue Loss; Demand for Duty Difference Justified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23583</link>
      <description>Import of the goods duty-free for use thereof in EOU - The duty forgone at the time of import became loss to Revenue. - appellant has discharged duty liability at normal rate of excise duty which is not equal to customs duty forgone. - prima facie the demand raised appears to be correct - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:15:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>