<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 952 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on Directors and a company under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for evasion of duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments against duty evasion allegations and penalties were rejected. Evidence indicated the involvement of the appellants and buyers in unaccounted clearances. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, denying a reduction in the penalty under Section 11AC for the appellant, as they did not fully discharge the duty owed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 952 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on Directors and a company under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for evasion of duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments against duty evasion allegations and penalties were rejected. Evidence indicated the involvement of the appellants and buyers in unaccounted clearances. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, denying a reduction in the penalty under Section 11AC for the appellant, as they did not fully discharge the duty owed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>