<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant, by assembling and embedding heavy storage racks at clients&#039; premises, was considered a manufacturer of immovable goods exempt from excise duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that the racks became immovable only when affixed to earth was accepted, distinguishing them from movable goods subject to duty upon clearance. The Tribunal noted the necessity of welded components for the racks to function as intended, indicating their immovable nature. As a result, the appellant was not liable under the Central Excise Act, and the appeal was allowed pending verification of deposit particulars for potential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant, by assembling and embedding heavy storage racks at clients&#039; premises, was considered a manufacturer of immovable goods exempt from excise duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that the racks became immovable only when affixed to earth was accepted, distinguishing them from movable goods subject to duty upon clearance. The Tribunal noted the necessity of welded components for the racks to function as intended, indicating their immovable nature. As a result, the appellant was not liable under the Central Excise Act, and the appeal was allowed pending verification of deposit particulars for potential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>