<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260999</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow expenditure on development charges as capital expenditure. The ITAT held that the expenses were revenue in nature as they did not result in enduring capital advantage, based on the continuous and routine nature of the testing process. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 18,731,381, emphasizing that the development expenses did not lead to lasting capital benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260999</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow expenditure on development charges as capital expenditure. The ITAT held that the expenses were revenue in nature as they did not result in enduring capital advantage, based on the continuous and routine nature of the testing process. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 18,731,381, emphasizing that the development expenses did not lead to lasting capital benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>