https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170905 Under Order 20 Rule 11(2) CPC, instalments for payment of a decretal amount can be granted only with the decree-holder's express consent. Mere non-filing of objections by the decree-holder does not amount to implied consent, and a judgment-debtor cannot demand instalments on that basis. Authorities cited by the revisionist were treated as fact-specific or concerned with alteration of the decree, which was not shown or sought here. The refusal to fix instalments was therefore sustained in the absence of the decree-holder's express agreement. en-us Thu, 23 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:02:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170905 Under Order 20 Rule 11(2) CPC, instalments for payment of a decretal amount can be granted only with the decree-holder's express consent. Mere non-filing of objections by the decree-holder does not amount to implied consent, and a judgment-debtor cannot demand instalments on that basis. Authorities cited by the revisionist were treated as fact-specific or concerned with alteration of the decree, which was not shown or sought here. The refusal to fix instalments was therefore sustained in the absence of the decree-holder's express agreement. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 23 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170905