<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confusion Over Service of Notice by Afixature u/s 148 IT Act; Occupancy Status Discrepancy Raises Questions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23562</link>
    <description>Service of notice u/s 148 by affixture - We fail to understand when the house was vacant in the month of January, 2008 how same person was residing at the same address in the month of December, 2008. This goes to prove that the appellant is determined to decline to accept the notice. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:31:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confusion Over Service of Notice by Afixature u/s 148 IT Act; Occupancy Status Discrepancy Raises Questions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23562</link>
      <description>Service of notice u/s 148 by affixture - We fail to understand when the house was vacant in the month of January, 2008 how same person was residing at the same address in the month of December, 2008. This goes to prove that the appellant is determined to decline to accept the notice. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:31:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>