<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 913 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260988</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, holding that input services availed for setting up a business in Uttrakhand entitle the appellant to cenvat credit, even if the business did not materialize. The decision was based on the interpretation of the input services definition in Rule 2(l) allowing credit for services related to the business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 913 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260988</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, holding that input services availed for setting up a business in Uttrakhand entitle the appellant to cenvat credit, even if the business did not materialize. The decision was based on the interpretation of the input services definition in Rule 2(l) allowing credit for services related to the business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>