<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 902 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260977</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed to proceed despite a delay in filing. The respondent sought winding up of the appellant for not handing over funds collected for maintenance, leading to a court order for the appellant to deposit the amount with interest. The appellant, facing financial difficulties, was permitted to make installment payments. The court emphasized mediation for resolving the dispute outside of court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 902 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260977</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed to proceed despite a delay in filing. The respondent sought winding up of the appellant for not handing over funds collected for maintenance, leading to a court order for the appellant to deposit the amount with interest. The appellant, facing financial difficulties, was permitted to make installment payments. The court emphasized mediation for resolving the dispute outside of court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>