<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by revenue, upholding the CIT(A) order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the set off of loss relating to the merged company. The decision emphasized that errors based on expert advice do not warrant penalties under section 271(1)(c) and penalties are applicable only in cases of proven concealment of income, not mere differences in interpretation or calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by revenue, upholding the CIT(A) order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the set off of loss relating to the merged company. The decision emphasized that errors based on expert advice do not warrant penalties under section 271(1)(c) and penalties are applicable only in cases of proven concealment of income, not mere differences in interpretation or calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>