https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260941 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the rejection of their remission claim for duty on goods destroyed in a fire caused by an electrical short circuit. The tribunal held that the fire constituted an "unavoidable accident," following precedents emphasizing a liberal interpretation of such incidents. Citing relevant judgments, the tribunal granted the appellant the remission of duty, setting aside the initial rejection and allowing consequential relief in line with legal principles. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jun 2015 06:02:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260941 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the rejection of their remission claim for duty on goods destroyed in a fire caused by an electrical short circuit. The tribunal held that the fire constituted an "unavoidable accident," following precedents emphasizing a liberal interpretation of such incidents. Citing relevant judgments, the tribunal granted the appellant the remission of duty, setting aside the initial rejection and allowing consequential relief in line with legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260941