<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 864 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision based on a previous ruling in the assessee&#039;s case, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal and granting relief to the assessee. The department&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit and the imposition of penalties were not accepted, and the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 06:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 864 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision based on a previous ruling in the assessee&#039;s case, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal and granting relief to the assessee. The department&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit and the imposition of penalties were not accepted, and the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>