<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 863 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260938</link>
    <description>A domestic sub-contractor supplying goods for ONGC petroleum operations was held entitled to central excise exemption under Notification No. 6/06-CE despite not producing the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons certificate linked to the customs exemption conditions. The dispute turned on whether condition No. 29 of Notification No. 21/02-CUS applied to an Indian manufacturer acting as a sub-contractor. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that this certificate requirement does not apply to such sub-contractors, so denial of exemption on that ground was unsustainable. The demand, interest, and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 863 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260938</link>
      <description>A domestic sub-contractor supplying goods for ONGC petroleum operations was held entitled to central excise exemption under Notification No. 6/06-CE despite not producing the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons certificate linked to the customs exemption conditions. The dispute turned on whether condition No. 29 of Notification No. 21/02-CUS applied to an Indian manufacturer acting as a sub-contractor. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that this certificate requirement does not apply to such sub-contractors, so denial of exemption on that ground was unsustainable. The demand, interest, and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>