https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260937 The Tribunal upheld the anti-dumping duty demand with interest for certain companies importing CFL components from China in SKD form. It reclassified the goods as complete CFLs, applying Rule 2(a) of the Customs Tariff Act, leading to the imposition of anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal affirmed penalties on importing firms but set aside penalties on officials. It upheld fines for seized goods but set aside fines for goods not available for confiscation. The demand for anti-dumping duty on some companies and penalties on others were set aside. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260937 The Tribunal upheld the anti-dumping duty demand with interest for certain companies importing CFL components from China in SKD form. It reclassified the goods as complete CFLs, applying Rule 2(a) of the Customs Tariff Act, leading to the imposition of anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal affirmed penalties on importing firms but set aside penalties on officials. It upheld fines for seized goods but set aside fines for goods not available for confiscation. The demand for anti-dumping duty on some companies and penalties on others were set aside. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260937