<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260935</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a small-scale industry, while upholding the decision of the technical Member and the third Member regarding the classification of imported goods. The conflicting expert opinions were considered, leading to the removal of the penalty due to the sale of the goods post-confiscation. No costs were awarded, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260935</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a small-scale industry, while upholding the decision of the technical Member and the third Member regarding the classification of imported goods. The conflicting expert opinions were considered, leading to the removal of the penalty due to the sale of the goods post-confiscation. No costs were awarded, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>