<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 852 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the other income earned by the assessee, considered as business income, should not be excluded from the profits of the business for computing the deduction under Section 10B. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 and restored that of the Assessing Officer, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 06:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 852 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the other income earned by the assessee, considered as business income, should not be excluded from the profits of the business for computing the deduction under Section 10B. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 and restored that of the Assessing Officer, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>