<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 848 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260923</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order confirming the addition of capital gains as unexplained cash credit, remanding the case to the AO for fresh adjudication. The appeals challenged the discrepancies in share transactions and the failure to consider relevant documents. The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair reassessment by the AO to ensure a just outcome and providing the assessee with an opportunity for a thorough review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 848 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260923</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order confirming the addition of capital gains as unexplained cash credit, remanding the case to the AO for fresh adjudication. The appeals challenged the discrepancies in share transactions and the failure to consider relevant documents. The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair reassessment by the AO to ensure a just outcome and providing the assessee with an opportunity for a thorough review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>