<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized that the Revenue failed to prove understatement of consideration or purchase price, citing the burden of proof on the Revenue to establish discrepancies. The Tribunal reiterated that taxation cannot be based on assumptions and highlighted the importance of documentary evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized that the Revenue failed to prove understatement of consideration or purchase price, citing the burden of proof on the Revenue to establish discrepancies. The Tribunal reiterated that taxation cannot be based on assumptions and highlighted the importance of documentary evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>