<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 835 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and the Assessee&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the loan amount received from M/s. Abhishek Engineers Pvt. Ltd. as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and jurisdictional limitations in appeals, citing relevant case laws and lack of evidence that the Assessee was a shareholder of the lending company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 835 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and the Assessee&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the loan amount received from M/s. Abhishek Engineers Pvt. Ltd. as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and jurisdictional limitations in appeals, citing relevant case laws and lack of evidence that the Assessee was a shareholder of the lending company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>