<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 672 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170902</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 3980 of 2004 as the Revenue failed to prove the classification of the excisable article was wrong due to an inconclusive report of the Chemical Examiner. Consequently, C.A. No. 3439-3442/2004 &amp;amp; C.A. No. 215/2007 were also dismissed without awaiting service in other matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:16:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 672 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170902</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 3980 of 2004 as the Revenue failed to prove the classification of the excisable article was wrong due to an inconclusive report of the Chemical Examiner. Consequently, C.A. No. 3439-3442/2004 &amp;amp; C.A. No. 215/2007 were also dismissed without awaiting service in other matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>