<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an appeal should not be dismissed solely for alleged non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction where the underlying dispute required adjudication on merits. Noting that the controversy over sale and purchase of SIM cards was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, it granted waiver of pre-deposit and remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision on merits without insisting on deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an appeal should not be dismissed solely for alleged non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction where the underlying dispute required adjudication on merits. Noting that the controversy over sale and purchase of SIM cards was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, it granted waiver of pre-deposit and remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision on merits without insisting on deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>