<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 825 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a tax dispute case. The decision highlighted the applicability of the benefit of exclusion based on personal use as per Circular 108, emphasizing distinctions from previous cases. Regarding the Composition Scheme, the Tribunal noted discrepancies in taxation within the complex. The issue of deduction for materials consumed was raised, with the appellants providing supporting evidence. The extended period of limitation was contested, with the Tribunal acknowledging the appellants&#039; arguments and granting a stay against recovery, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 825 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a tax dispute case. The decision highlighted the applicability of the benefit of exclusion based on personal use as per Circular 108, emphasizing distinctions from previous cases. Regarding the Composition Scheme, the Tribunal noted discrepancies in taxation within the complex. The issue of deduction for materials consumed was raised, with the appellants providing supporting evidence. The extended period of limitation was contested, with the Tribunal acknowledging the appellants&#039; arguments and granting a stay against recovery, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>